Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
State - Budget
State used borrowed funds to meet expenses

State used borrowed funds to meet expenses

 

By Ed Jacovino  Journal Inquirer

Published: Saturday, January 7, 2012 12:53 AM EST

 

HARTFORDThe state had to use borrowed money to boost its checking account balance in December, a move that sparked a debate between Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, a Democrat, and Republicans who charge the move indicates poor budgeting.

“The state treasurer acknowledged what we have been saying for some time: That we are borrowing to cover daily expenses and keep state government running,” House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, said Friday. “It is outrageous that the Democrats rammed through the largest tax increase in history and we are borrowing millions for state employee salaries and to keep the lights on.”

Cafero was referencing a report from Treasurer Denise L. Nappier in which Nappier, a Democrat, said she took money raised by selling bonds and transferred it into the state’s cash pool to prop up the operating budget. “Bond proceeds were borrowed for the common cash pool,” her report says.

In a letter to lawmakers, she painted a rosier picture: “We temporarily transferred bond proceeds to and from the common cash pool to address mismatches in the timing of receipts and disbursements,” Nappier wrote.

 

And Nappier added that the transfers were done in a “formal and structured process” for managing the state’s cash flow.

The issue points to a long-running Republican complaint that the state blends revenue from different sources to hide budget problems, Cafero said. Nappier’s report says the state ended November with $195.7 million in the cash pool. That’s enough to run the state for about two days, Cafero said.

Republicans had raised similar concerns in 2010 under Gov. M. Jodi Rell, a Republican.

“This is not only mortgaging the future, this is the same fiscal slight-of-hand that led to the downgrading of our credit,” Cafero said. Fitch Ratings Services downgraded the state’s credit in June 2010 from AA-plus to AA.

Malloy responded with a statement from budget director Benjamin Barnes. “Anyone in business knows that cash and operations are not the same thing, and so should Representative Cafero,” Barnes said. “The budget passed by the legislature was balanced, and continues to be balanced today.”

Reports from Barnes’ office and from Comptroller Kevin Lembo, a Democrat, project the state finishing the fiscal year in June with about an $80 million surplus.

Barnes said the cash shortfall was because the state had pushed payments across calendar and budget years instead of following a set of rules known as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

“If the state had followed GAAP all along, that money would be available, as cash, to support operating costs, and even to reduce the cost of borrowing for capital investments,” Barnes said.

He added that Nappier’s action wouldn’t affect the state’s credit rating. “Treasurer Nappier is properly and prudently managing the cash on behalf of the state and has done nothing wrong,” Barnes said. “Her cash management practices will not jeopardize the state’s credit rating, nor will they change the state’s debt service costs in any way.”

Cafero dismissed Barnes’ explanation, saying the accounting rules and the projected budget surpluses have little to do with the cash flow problem. He said it was “like me talking about the price of rice in China to answer a question about the cost of gasoline in America.”

“What is the most scary thing is that the budget secretary is either purposefully confusing the issue or … doesn’t understand it himself,” Cafero said.

He said the issue — and that the state’s cash on hand has steadily decreased — shows that state agencies aren’t meeting projected savings goals built into the budget.